Wendy Williams has had enough. In a recent emotional phone call to The View, she expressed her frustration with her current guardianship and demanded a change. Wendy’s voice was filled with anger as she declared, “How dare they say I have incapacitation. I do not!” It’s clear that she is desperate to regain control over her life and finances, hoping to return to some semblance of normalcy.

For 11 minutes, Wendy pleaded for her freedom, insisting that she needed a new guardian to take over her case. She made it clear that without this change, she would not be able to move forward. “I need a new guardian, and then I’ll get out of guardianship,” she said. Wendy’s outcry raised the question of whether her tough stance would help or hurt her case in court.

To gain perspective, experts weighed in. Guardianship attorney Tamar Armanac and legal analyst Trey Lovel shared their thoughts on Wendy’s public plea. Lovel expressed concern about Wendy’s decision to make her grievances public by appearing on The View. “Going on the show is certainly not the best way to convince a judge,” he stated. “It’s a worry and a concern. I wouldn’t want her giving interviews like that.”

Wendy has been under guardianship for some time, and her struggles have been well-documented. From battling addiction to facing health issues, Wendy’s journey has been one of ups and downs. She acknowledged her past struggles with alcohol and drugs, revealing how they had a major impact on her life. “When I was hooked on cocaine, I lost over a decade of my life,” she admitted. However, Wendy also shared her successes in overcoming these challenges, declaring, “I’m going on with my life, alcohol-free. No more alcohol, thank you.”

Still, despite her progress, there is ongoing debate about whether she is ready to return to the public eye. Wendy has been a well-known figure in radio and television, but her situation now raises questions about her ability to handle the pressure of the spotlight. “The Wendy we see today—would you allow her to go back on TV or on the radio?” Lovel asked. His response was cautious, saying that he would hesitate to send her back out until it’s clear she can manage the intense scrutiny that comes with being in the public eye.

Wendy’s case highlights the complex issues surrounding conservatorships and guardianships. Some believe these legal mechanisms are necessary to protect vulnerable individuals, but others, like Wendy, feel they limit their freedom and independence. In Wendy’s case, experts argue that a guardianship might not be the right way to manage her substance issues or to prevent her from relapsing. “These types of conservatorships would be the wrong mechanism to use to try to prevent Wendy from drinking or having substance issues,” Armanac noted.

As Wendy continues to fight for her freedom, the public will no doubt be watching closely. Whether her tough talk and demands will lead to a change in her guardianship remains to be seen, but one thing is clear—Wendy Williams is determined to regain control over her life.