During a recent diplomatic meeting, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took a strong and assertive stance, surprising many with his bold approach. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller expressed shock at Zelenskyy’s tone, calling it disrespectful and insulting to the United States. He argued that the U.S. has been Ukraine’s biggest supporter, and Zelenskyy should have shown more gratitude rather than making demands.

Miller described the moment as historic, praising former President Donald Trump and Senator J.D. Vance for standing firm on American interests. He emphasized that the U.S. has provided immense military and financial support to Ukraine, often at great cost to American taxpayers. According to Miller, the war has drained U.S. resources, depleted stockpiles, and even impacted national security. Yet, instead of expressing appreciation, Zelenskyy came to the White House demanding more assistance, comparing U.S. support unfavorably to that of Europe.

He went on to say that many Americans do not fully understand the extent of their country’s contributions to Ukraine. For years, the U.S. has provided weapons, training, and financial aid, but Zelenskyy’s visit was marked by complaints rather than acknowledgment of this help. Miller criticized the Ukrainian leader for suggesting that America has not done enough, arguing that no U.S. citizen wants to send their sons and daughters to fight on behalf of Ukraine.

Trump, according to Miller, made it clear that peace should be the priority. He positioned himself as a leader willing to stand up for American interests rather than simply fulfilling the wishes of foreign leaders. Miller suggested that for the first time since the conflict began, a Western leader—Trump—asserted the importance of the U.S.’s own needs rather than unconditionally supporting Ukraine. He also condemned the way Zelenskyy has been treated as a nearly messianic figure in international politics, arguing that while the suffering in Ukraine is tragic, the primary concern should be avoiding World War III.

Fox News host Jesse Watters echoed Miller’s concerns, questioning Zelenskyy’s diplomatic approach. He found it perplexing that Zelenskyy would criticize the very country providing the majority of Ukraine’s support. Unlike the U.S., European nations have not contributed at the same level, making Zelenskyy’s comparison seem misplaced. Watters speculated that Zelenskyy’s outburst might have been a strategic move or an act of desperation, but he found it unsettling that the Ukrainian leader could not even offer a simple “thank you” to the American people.

→ Swipe to see more articles

Related Posts

“Il n’avait plus un muscle” : Cléo, la femme d’Herbert Léonard, raconte ses derniers jours

Nolwenn Leroy critique envers certains chanteurs absents des Enfoirés, elle expose le fond de sa pensée ! ” Je ne vois ça que comme ça”

Tatiana Silva : Saviez-vous vraiment qui est le mystérieux papa de la petite June, l’enfant de la Miss Météo ?

« Un dimanche à la campagne » : bientôt une déclinaison pour l’émission, les confidences de Frédéric Lopez-TB

Florent Pagny en rémission : “Ça me fait marrer”, la fille du chanteur Ael révèle l’une de ses manies qui irrite sa mère

STAR’S LAST WISHES Iconic 1980s band star’s astonishing £46 million will revealed after legend’s tragic death aged 60

The discussion also touched on Zelenskyy’s rejection of Trump’s call for a ceasefire. Watters found this particularly troubling, arguing that if Zelenskyy truly wanted peace, he would not dismiss the idea so quickly. Instead, Zelenskyy emphasized Europe’s contributions while continuing to seek additional aid and protection from the U.S.

Miller concluded by reaffirming Trump’s leadership, describing him as a peacemaker. He argued that during Trump’s previous term, the world experienced four years of peace, and now, with Trump back in the political spotlight, America is once again seeing strong leadership. He praised Trump for taking a firm stance, reinforcing that America’s role should be about securing its own future rather than being endlessly entangled in foreign conflicts.