The Obama Presidential Library has been in development for eight years, yet it remains unfinished. Despite the delays, it has already set a record—the longest time between a president leaving office and the grand opening of their library, now approaching 3,000 days. Initially estimated to cost $350 million, the price tag has more than doubled to over $800 million due to various setbacks, including weather-related delays.

For perspective, the United Center, home to the Chicago Bulls, was built for less than $200 million. This raises the question: is Obama’s legacy more significant than that of Michael Jordan? Notably, Jordan himself contributed to the project, along with billionaire George Soros, yet even their financial support hasn’t been enough to get the project completed.

From the start, the project was heavily focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Obama ensured that at least one-third of the workforce comprised minorities, with no exceptions. However, the project suffered a major setback three years ago when a worker discovered what appeared to be a noose at the site. This led to a temporary halt in construction as all workers were sent to anti-bias training. Since then, progress has stalled, and the site has fallen into disrepair, with cracked concrete and unfinished structures visible.

Now, some of the same DEI contractors involved in the project are suing Obama’s foundation for $40 million, alleging racial discrimination. The lawsuit and rising costs highlight a broader issue—how initiatives meant to promote inclusivity can sometimes lead to unintended consequences such as legal disputes, inefficiencies, and financial overruns.

The Obama Library isn’t the only example of such challenges. The Biden administration has also encountered similar issues, with DEI-based hiring policies slowing infrastructure projects across the country. In states like Maine, where the population is predominantly white, efforts to meet diversity quotas in construction hiring have made it difficult to complete projects efficiently. Critics argue that such policies contribute to unnecessary bureaucracy, leading to delays and inflated costs.

These issues contrast sharply with the criticisms once directed at Donald Trump, who was accused of not paying contractors on time. Now, the question arises: will Democrats hold Obama accountable for the same concerns? Despite his global influence and impact on domestic policies, his library remains unfinished in a local park, while Trump’s own presidential library could be completed first.

Adding to the controversy is the architectural design of the Obama Library. Many have criticized its aesthetics, calling it unappealing and uninspired. Regardless of race or gender, the priority should be quality and efficiency in construction. However, when racial quotas are imposed on contracts, projects often become entangled in legal battles rather than progressing smoothly.

Ultimately, the Obama Library serves as a symbol of his presidency—marked by ambitious promises, significant financial overruns, and delays. As billionaires continue funding the project, it remains uncertain when it will be completed or whether it will ever meet its original vision. Meanwhile, Trump’s library is on track to be finished sooner—perhaps even with funding from an unexpected source, as some humorously speculate that Mexico might pay for it.